The images in this article were generated with artificial intelligence. How we publish
Palo Alto Networks has warned about a vulnerability of critical severity on the User-ID authentication portal (known as the Captive Portal) of PAN-OS that is already being exploited in targeted attacks. Identified as CVE-2026-0300, is a buffer overflow that allows an unauthenticated attacker to run arbitrary code with root privileges on PA-Series and VM-Series devices exposed to the Internet by specially manipulated packages.
The ability to run code as root in a firewall implies an extreme risk: an attacker can deactivate controls, create persistence, intercept or manipulate traffic, and use the committed equipment as a trampoline to move laterally within the network. Therefore Palo Alto has described the failure with maximum severity and has indicated that there is already evidence of limited exploitation against authentication portals accessible from unreliable directions or the public Internet.

If your organization uses PAN-OS, check immediately if the authentication portal is enabled and exposed. Palo Alto offers a page with technical details and initial recommendations in your official notice: https: / / security.paloaltonetworks.com / CVE-2026-0300. It is also appropriate to check the specific configuration of the Captive Portal in the product technical documentation to quickly identify and mitigate exposure: https: / / docs.paloaltonetworks.com /... / confire-captive-portal.
A worrying background: Internet tracking services detect thousands of publicly accessible PAN-OS firewalls. Shadowserver, for example, reports more than 5,800 online exposed VM-Series firewalls, mainly concentrated in Asia and North America; that means that the potential attack surface is large and that many organizations could be at risk until a patch or final mitigation is applied. See public follow-up here: https: / / dashboard.Shadowserver.org /....
Until Palo Alto publishes a patch, the most urgent and practical measure is to reduce exposure: restricts access to the User-ID Authentication Portal to trusted network areas and, if it cannot guarantee such a restriction, disable the portal temporarily. This recommendation is consistent with safety practices in perimeter management: never leave sensitive services accessible from unreliable networks without additional controls.
In addition to disabling or blocking access, implement compensatory controls: apply access control list (ACL) rules on network edges and transit providers to block access to the interface from public addresses, require the use of VPNs or management tunnels for remote administration, and ensure that firewall management is not directly exposed to the Internet. Prioritize event log and device integrity alerts for abnormal behaviors (unplanned reinitiations, unauthorized configuration changes, suspicious IP connections).

If you suspect commitment, proceed with a response plan: isolate the affected equipment from the network, collect forensic devices (system log, configuration, traffic capture), do not trust the image of the device until a clean reconstruction from a known image and sign the administrative credentials after recovery. Consider the assistance of an external forensic team and report the incident to the relevant parties according to regulatory requirements and contracts.
This vulnerability is in a trend: in recent months several PAN-OS failures have been exploited in nature, showing that safety devices with exposed interfaces are priority targets for attackers seeking persistent control. Since Palo Alto is a supplier of a large portion of the global critical and corporate infrastructure, the potential impacts range from point interruptions to gaps that compromise sensitive information from customers and employees.
Finally, document and automate detection and mitigation: invent all firewalls and authentication portals, prioritize those publicly exposed, apply emerging access rules and plan the application of the official patch as soon as it is available. Keep informed through the manufacturer's notice and reputable intelligence feeds; the window between disclosure and mass exploitation can be short, so speed and operational discipline are key to minimizing impact.
Related
More news on the same subject.

Four Plex2Shell CVE allows remote execution and mining and proxy backdoor deployment
In recent days, an increase in attacks has been confirmed that take advantage of a chain of failures in Plex Media Server - nicknamed "Plex2Shell" by researchers - to run code r...

GhostAction Expands Attack: phishing to steal credentials and persistence in VS Code
A group behind the GhostAction campaign - already known for infiltrating GitHub Actions workflows into open source projects - has expanded its arsenal: in addition to installing...

OpenCode: possible exposure of AI suppliers in Console affects 1.4% of users
On the night of October 16 there was an unauthorized access to a system inherited from OpenCode which, according to the company, could have exposed keys from IA suppliers that u...

ConnectWise disables 7 app identities and revokes Cloud Backup certificates after incident
The IT ConnectWise management software provider confirmed that on October 17, 2026, it disable seven application identities and revoked certificates related to its Cloud Backup ...

Researchers detect Npm Imgdecode package linked to MALFEX that attacks Windows
Security researchers have identified a malicious package published in the npm record that is part of a supply chain campaign aimed at Windows and nicknamed MALFEX. The package, ...

OpenBSD 7.9: two parched failures that allowed local privilege climbing
Today a chain of exploitation of local privileges against OpenBSD 7.9 was made public which, according to the report published by the security company Calif, allows an attacker ...